Archive for the 'Design' Category

10
Feb
09

I Can Make You Read This

980734_18929264Studies show that you aren’t reading this sentence because of the title or because you are interested in what I have to say, but because you like the photo.

Why? Because the photo is eliciting some kind of emotional response in you, therefore your eyes are being drawn to it, and you choose to read this story to find out what the heck it’s all about.

In a Telegraph article, Paul Bray states:
“There are…’mammalian’ elements dealing with the senses and emotions…most decisions are based on emotion and rationalized afterwards…this makes life more fun for most of us…but a nightmare for designers and advertisers.”

EMOTION IS KILLING THE FOCUS GROUP

When in a focus group, participants tend to tell you their rationalizations, not their emotions. After all, we can’t communicate raw emotion. We can show it in our faces, but then it’s up to others to rationalize it for us. And when someone asks us how we feel about something, we have to find ways to “put it into words.” But words just won’t do.

That’s why neuromarketing is on its way to replacing focus groups. We can now study the brain’s reaction without human rationalization. No more failed product launches because I can show you images and see your raw emotional responses. Packaging can be designed to ensure your hand grabs my company’s box of crackers off the shelf.

Even now, cars are being designed with neuromarketing technology to ensure you react to the grille and headlights (does it look like a face to you? You don’t know it makes you more likely to buy).

I’M NOT GOING TO GET INTO ETHICS

Sure it’s mind reading, but I’d be a much happier person if I liked everything I saw. I would be broke and wanting, but what an aesthetic world I would live in.

Tomorrow: Did President Obama neuromarket his way into the White House?

28
Jan
09

New Tropicana Packaging Turns Away Customers

I first heard about the new Tropicana packaging from a friend of mine who is an extremely busy working mother of two. She told me of her weekly trip to the grocery with her two boys (8 and 2 years old) and how her eyes bugged at the OJ cooler.

“They changed all the packaging!” she said. “And it’s not color coordinated anymore. I’m used to just grabbing the blue one (reduced sugar). I have my two-year old with me. I don’t have time to sit and figure out what’s going on with the orange juice, so I bought the King Soopers brand just to spite Tropicana.”

Granted, there actually is still some color coordination going on for Tropicana (who, incidentally has 18 kinds of orange juice to choose from), but it’s very subtle. In fact, it’s only on the top of the box. In the old packaging, the color keys were about five times larger. Look at the picture below and tell me how well you would notice the colors in a giant cooler with a 2-year old screaming in your ear.

picture-1I give Tropicana props for the new look, though. Not only is it clean and simple, therefore making it stand out from the clutter, but it also plays to our psychology (um, neuromarketing*) by attracting us with the look of a generic brand. Basically, we will feel like we are saving money, even though we are not.

And yet, this neuromarketing fails the test with moms and other bloggers. Susan Gunelius over at Brand Curve says, “They’re not fooling anyone.  The cheap looking 7-11-esque packaging doesn’t make me feel any better about forking over a whole lot of money so my kids can get their Vitamin C in the morning.”

*Speaking of neuromarketing, Beth and I are gearing up for a full week of it in February. We’ll explain what it is, how it works, and why it matters with plenty of examples and insights from industry professionals. We are even running a few tests of our own. I have Beth on a treadmill right now, hooked up to all kinds of machines, and small animals are randomly jumping out of boxes and shrieking at her. Each of those animals has an ad taped to their back so I can measure Beth’s reaction to them. I’ll let you know the results.

By the way, none of the animals are being harmed. They all volunteered for this and I have their signatures to prove it.

19
Dec
08

Can you guess what’s wrong with these pictures?

We ran across the blog Photoshop Disasters and couldn’t help but share some of what we thought were the funniest and most-difficult-to-figure-out faux pas. See if you can find the blunders.

Nice arm. All 10 feet of it.

Nice arm. All 10 feet of it.

Is her forearm on the plate, because it's not attached to her elbow?

Is her forearm on the plate? Because it's sure not attached to her elbow.

Since when are reflections totally transparent?

Since when are reflections totally transparent?

This one is self-explanatory.

It's true. If our plates floated then the buffet line would be much easier to manage.

She lost her finger in a bar fight.

She lost her finger in a bar fight.

I bet she has a hard time finding gloves.

I bet she has a hard time finding gloves.

For more Photoshop disasters, visit the site here.




Share The Side Note

Facebook Twitter More...

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,574 other followers

Weise Twitter

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,574 other followers