Archive for the 'Bad PR' Category

10
Sep
10

You Want to Put Your Mouth On My What? Communication Principles in Practice at Your Hospital.

At the Side Note Blog we can’t really let a nipple sucking doctor get by without comment, now can we?

The story is rather offensive. A 20-year-old woman went to the doctor for a breast exam because of fluid seeping from her breast. The male doctor decided to “diagnose” the fluid seepage by obtaining permission to suck  her breast. Yes, he sucked on her breast. Unfortunately the Finnish court let the doctor off of sexual solicitation charges brought by the patient because the doctor  asked and obtained permission from the patient to suck on her breast.

Are you kidding me?

What was the patient supposed to say?

I am sure her “permission” sounded something like “uh… uh huh?”

I never went to medical school, but even I can come up with numerous ways of extracting a bodily fluid for testing that does not include anything unhygienic or overtly sexual.

I think it’s time to send med students and physicians back to school for additional communication courses. We are taught from a very young age to trust physicians. To do what they tell us to do. When they prescribe a medicine, we take it. When they order a test, we get it. A 20-year-old women worried about her health, seeking the advice of a physician, probably didn’t know HOW to respond to the physician’s offensive request.

I have had the pleasure to work with many wonderful physicians over the years. They all know that they leverage power over their patients. The good ones don’t abuse that power. The good physicians embrace this power and use it to inspire hope, increase confidence and decrease fear.

What are your physicians saying to their patients? How does their power of persuasion impact the healthcare provided by your institution? And what communication training do you use to ensure there is no offensive behavior at your organization? Tell us your stories here.

14
Jun
10

Lack of Social Media Planning Spells Disaster for Capri Sun

Will Capri Sun recover from the negative press it is receiving about the mysterious growth found in an individual juice pouch purchased from BJ’S Wholesale Club in Homestead, Florida? That remains to be seen, but one thing is for sure, the lack of a social media plan has damaged Capri Sun.

It started on Memorial Day when Melissa Wiegand Brown posted this picture of a globule of gunk extracted from her son’s Capri Sun pouch on her Facebook page. Within hours, the FDA in Orlando was contacted, the picture went viral and the wild speculation began.  The gunk was sent to a lab for testing and it appears the first time Kraft Foods, Capri Sun parent company, got involved was asking for the results from the lab.

Really?

After a week of non-response, Kraft issued the following statement, “We recently received word from a consumer about an issue with a Capri Sun pouch. We understand that some of you are concerned. Now that we’ve tested the material, we’ve confirmed it was mold. While unpleasant, it is not a safety issue.”

Finally, Capri Sun has released a well done FAQ on the Kraft Facebook page to address consumer concerns. However, the Capri Sun’s lack of activity has not prevented the story from going mainstream, it appears in today’s Chicago Tribune.

There are four key elements to a social media crisis plan, let’s evaluate where Capri Sun fell short in this crisis for each of these elements.

1.    Build your network before you need your network.
You can’t start social media crisis communications in the middle of a crisis. Capri Sun’s lack of social media planning meant they were seeking people to join their social network instead of communicating with an already established network.

2.    Communicate quickly; acknowledge awareness and accept responsibility.
Capri Sun simply let too much time go by before communicating with the public on the story.  Speculation from human body parts, to animals, to questioning the production locations for Capri Sun were mentioned without response from Capri Sun. Acknowledging the concern as soon as possible, even just to day ‘We are investigating’ would have been a better approach.

3.    Communicate often; provide regular updates to stem the tide of rampant speculation.
Capri Sun allowed too much information to go unchallenged. When the hysterical comments are flowing, someone needs to answer them. It gives the appearance that Capri Sun does not take food safety seriously.

4.    Authenticity matters when speaking to customers, prospects, interested parties and the general public.

Even though they missed the timing, the latest communication from Vinay Sharma, director of Capri Sun Beverages expresses authenticity. “We appreciate that our Facebook community is so engaged and willing to share their point of view. Whenever you have questions about one of our products, it’s important that you’re in the know about what we know. It’s also important that you have the most accurate and up-to-date information from us.”

Capri Sun was only successful with one of the four social media crisis planning keys.  It will be interesting to see the impact on Capri Sun sales and the rehabilitation attempts Kraft implements to repair its image.

In the meantime, I’ll only be drinking 100 percent pure Florida orange juice.

Since we are building our network before we need it, check out Weise Communications on Facebook and “Like” it for future updates and follow us on Twitter.

21
Jan
10

Is Royal Caribbean sailing into a great PR story, or sinking their own ships?

This week’s news from the LA Times about Royal Caribbean cruise lines is twofold. First, they are pledging at least a million dollars to help earthquake-ravaged Haiti. Second, they are continuing a port of call for their cruise ship passengers 65 miles north of Port-au-Prince, where rescue workers are still searching through wreckage for victims.

It’s a mixed PR story that seems to waiver between good and bad. While Royal Caribbean is pushing their (albeit good) messages that include the delivery of pallets of food, handing off extra mattresses and lounge chairs for makeshift hospitals, and donating all proceeds from excursions on the island to the relief efforts, these messages are mixed in with stays at the private island being protected by armed guards and passengers feeling uncomfortable drinking frozen island drinks just up the road from starving and homeless quake survivors.

I think we should give Royal Caribbean credit for almost doing the right thing. Unfortunately their message is getting muddled. Buried at the end a story in the Guardian, this reference was made:

“The company said yesterday that U.S. coastguards have assessed the jetty and decided it could not be used for cargo ships.”

This is probably an important message that should have been more apparent. Cargo ships can’t access this private port, which is a great reason for the cruise ships to be docking and bringing supplies.

And the message about what is being delivered is good, too. I even think the message about “helping the local economy” is right. The problem is the repeated message of zip line tours and jet skiing. Royal Caribbean should have scaled back excursions for a few weeks. I realize that the local economy needs the infusion of American tourist dollars, but the grim reality of holiday merrymakers frolicking in the sun amidst so much anguish is just incomprehensible.

Clearly the executives at Royal Caribbean are working this story for as much PR exposure as they can get. And that’s fine. As a PR professional, I don’t begrudge them this opportunity. But wouldn’t it have made more sense to send a boat full of supplies instead of passengers? The fact that delivering the supplies is just “part of the schedule” reduces what could have been a bigger and better story. Send the staff down to re-build houses. Carry medical personnel to Haiti. Provide free transportation to the American families that are adopting orphans… now that would build a bigger PR story.

What do you think? Should Royal Caribbean be docking in Haiti? Fill out the survey below or respond with your comments.

14
Jan
10

If you are about to make a lot of people mad, consider your message and how you deliver it

When you really, truly need to hire a PR person….

I have a hard time believing the advice of Tiger Woods’ publicists has been “make a statement on your Web site and say nothing else to anyone, anywhere.” But that has been Woods’ mantra the last two months. And this has resulted in Woods receiving a lot of negative press, not just for his self-titled “indiscretions,” but also for his complete lack of communication with any media outlet.

Vanity Fair seized the opportunity (very quickly) to write a cover story about the situation in the current issue that exploited some Woods’ early, and quite frankly crude and rude, sexual remarks. If Tiger had come out and made a public address, would things be different? I don’t know. Maybe. But this is now a crisis-communications-gone-bad case study.

Woods has hurt the golf industry. His sponsors and the PGA TOUR will lose money over this scandal. A lot of people will lose money over this scandal. Woods would have done himself well to have been more publicly cognizant of the ripples of his actions.

But just “speaking to the media” will not get the job done. Take this weeks’ example of the ex-Tennessee football coach, Lane Kiffin. He abruptly resigned after 14-months on the job. If you know SEC football, you know the passion that exists with alumni and fans for their teams. Kiffin ignited a furry of passion on Tuesday night when he resigned as head coach for the Tennessee Vols and took his top staff members with him.

The PR problem he made only got worse when, in his hastily-called press conference, he made no apologies for leaving, he was arrogant in his statement and he refused to take questions. See the press conference for yourself:

His comments to the press sparked riots in Knoxville and ignited a flurry of online hostility. An article in American Chronicle illustrates that the online reaction to his departure included videos, tweets and Facebook pages.

Among the Facebook pages created in Kiffin’s departure is one called, “Dear Lane Kiffin, We hate you. Love, the Vols.” It has 36,402 members.

Another is, “I was betrayed by Lane Kiffin.” It has 12,904 members.

The lesson we need to learn from Kiffin and Woods is when you are about to make a lot of people mad, try to be humble in doing it. Try to show compassion. Try to act human. If we have learned nothing from politicians, it is that you can make mistakes and people will forgive you – if you admit the mistake, if you are regretful and if you promise to try to do right by your constituents. Many people don’t know how to craft these types of messages. And it is OK to admit you need help, because sometimes you really should just hire a good PR pro to do this type of work for you.

03
Apr
09

Leave it to the passengers

In early March, Ryanair, Europe’s largest low fares airline, invited passengers to submit their most creative ideas for the company’s next ancillary charges. This contest came about after Chief Executive Michael O’Leary announced that the airline is considering charging passengers to use the on-board toilets in an effort to reduce costs.

Only passengers could have come up with these wacky and hilarious ideas. Following are some of the best Ryanair has received thus far:

·        Charging for toilet paper – with O’Leary’s face on it
·        Charging €2.50 to read the safety cards
·        Charging €1 to use oxygen masks
·        Charging €25 to use the emergency exit
·        Charging €50 for bikini clad cabin crew

cardWhat a good way to turn a potentially damaging situation into something fun and engaging for your clientele. This contest will hopefully help ease the pain of extra charges, even if those involve paying to use the toilet.

17
Mar
09

Bad PR can be good

logoA great little story about embracing bad PR was recently brought to my attention.

New Belgium Brewery in Fort Collins, Colo., was accused by a former employee of not being as eco-friendly as its marketing materials claimed. The company has long said that its products are “100 percent wind-powered“. However, the ex-employee argued that New Belgium had purchased carbon credits to offset emissions.

After initially dismissing the claims and obtaining a restraining order against the former employee, New Belgium rethought its approach and eventually embraced the criticism using it “as a catalyst for increased transparency in its first-ever sustainability report, which it published last month,” according to the New York Times’ Green Inc. blog. New Belgium also developed a series of sustainability initiatives and has begun working with the city of Fort Collins, Colorado State University and other like-minded companies to help reduce peak-load electricity demand.

New Belgium saw an opportunity in all the criticism, seized it and came out better in the end. I think this is a perfect example of how a company can sometimes use bad PR to improve its business practices and boost its public image.




Share The Side Note

Facebook Twitter More...

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,574 other followers

Weise Twitter

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,574 other followers